The Internet Ends Here . Com

...because this is where it ends

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home News from the world
News about the end

The End of the Internet?

E-mail Print PDF

 

Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are developing strategies that would track and store information on our every move in cyberspace in a vast data-collection and marketing system, the scope of which could rival the National Security Agency. According to white papers now being circulated in the cable, telephone and telecommunications industries, those with the deepest pockets--corporations, special-interest groups and major advertisers--would get preferred treatment. Content from these providers would have first priority on our computer and television screens, while information seen as undesirable, such as peer-to-peer communications, could be relegated to a slow lane or simply shut out.

Share/Save/Bookmark


Last Updated on Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:59 Read more...
  No Comments.
Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)

Death of Free Internet is Imminent

E-mail Print PDF
In the last 15 years or so, as a society we have had access to more information than ever before in modern history because of the Internet. There are approximately 1 billion Internet users in the world B and any one of these users can theoretically communicate in real time with any other on the planet. The Internet has been the greatest technological achievement of the 20th century by far, and has been recognized as such by the global community.

The free transfer of information, uncensored, unlimited and untainted, still seems to be a dream when you think about it.  Whatever field that is mentioned- education, commerce, government, news, entertainment, politics and countless other areas-  have been radically affected by the introduction of the Internet. And mostly, it's good news, except when poor judgements are made and people are taken advantage of. Scrutiny and oversight are needed, especially where children are involved.

However, when there are potential profits open to a corporation, the needs of society don't count. Take the recent case in Canada with the behemoths, Telus and Rogers rolling out a charge for text messaging without any warning to the public. It was an arrogant and risky move for the telecommunications giants because it backfired. People actually used Internet technology to deliver a loud and clear message to these companies and that was to scrap the extra charge. The people used the power of the Internet against the big boys and the little guys won.

However, the issue of text messaging is just a tiny blip on the radar screens of Telus and another company, Bell Canada, the two largest Internet Service Providers (ISP'S) in Canada. Our country is being used as a test case to drastically change the delivery of Internet service forever. The change will be so radical that it has the potential to send us back to the horse and buggy days of information sharing and access.

In the upcoming weeks watch for a report in Time Magazine that will attempt to smooth over the rough edges of a diabolical plot by Bell Canada and Telus, to begin charging per site fees on most Internet sites.  The plan is to convert the Internet into a cable-like system, where customers sign up for specific web sites, and then pay to visit sites beyond a cutoff point.

From my browsing (on the currently free Internet) I have discovered that the 'demise' of the free Internet is slated for 2010 in Canada, and two years later around the world.  Canada is seen a good choice to implement such shameful and sinister changes, since Canadians are viewed as being laissez fair, politically uninformed and an easy target. The corporate marauders will iron out the wrinkles in Canada and then spring the new, castrated version of the Internet on the rest of the world, probably with little fanfare, except for some dire warnings about the 'evil' of the Internet (free) and the CEO's spouting about 'safety and security'. These buzzwords usually work pretty well.

What will the Internet look like in Canada in 2010? I suspect that the ISP's will provide a "package" program as companies like Cogeco currently do. Customers will pay for a series of websites as they do now for their television stations.  Television stations will be available on-line as part of these packages, which will make the networks happy since they have lost much of the younger market which are surfing and chatting on their computers in the evening. However, as is the case with cable television now, if you choose something that is not part of the package, you know what happens. You pay extra.

And this is where the Internet (free) as we know it will suffer almost immediate, economic strangulation. Thousands and thousands of Internet sites will not be part of the package so users will have to pay extra to visit those sites!  In just an hour or two it is possible to easily visit 20-30 sites or more while looking for information.  Just imagine how high these costs will be.

At present, the world condemns China because that country restricts certain websites. "They are undemocratic; they are removing people's freedom; they don't respect individual rights; they are censoring information,” are some of the comments we hear. But what Bell Canada and Telus have planned for Canadians is much worse than that.  They are planning the death of the Internet (free) as we know it, and I expect they'll be hardly a whimper from Canadians. It's all part of the corporate plan for a New World Order and virtually a masterstroke that will lead to the creation of billions and billions of dollars of corporate profit at the expense of the working and middle classes.

There are so many other implications as a result of these changes, far too many to elaborate on here. Be aware that we will all lose our privacy because all websites will be tracked as part of the billing procedure, and we will be literally cut off from 90% of the information that we can access today. The little guys on the Net will fall likes flies; Bloggers and small website operators will die a quick death because people will not pay to go to their sites and read their pages.

Ironically, the only medium that can save us is the one we are trying to save- the Internet (free). This article will be posted on my Blog, www.realitycheck.typepad.com and I encourage people and groups to learn more about this issue. Canadians can keep the Internet free just as they kept text messaging free.  Don't wait for the federal politicians. They will do nothing to help us.

I would welcome a letter to the editor of the Standard Freeholder from a spokesperson from Bell Canada or Telus telling me that I am absolutely wrong in what I have written, and that no such changes to the Internet are being planned, and that access to Internet sites will remain FREE in the years to come.  In the meantime, I encourage all of you to write to the media, ask questions, phone the radio station, phone a friend, or think of something else to prevent what appears to me to be inevitable.

Maintaining Internet (free) access is the only way we have a chance at combatting the global corporate takeover, the North American Union, and a long list of other deadly deeds that the elite in society have planned for us. Yesterday was too late in trying to protect our rights and freedoms. We must now redouble our efforts in order to give our children and grandchildren a fighting chance in the future.

Org. Source : author's website: http://realitycheck.typepad.com,  Global Research Articles by Kevin ParkinsonShare/Save/Bookmark


Last Updated on Wednesday, 30 July 2008 09:41
  No Comments.
Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)

It's the end of the Internet as we know it

E-mail Print PDF

The sky is falling in

Not since Chicken Licken took to the streets, and warned the other animals that the sky was falling in, has anyone had to pass on such momentous news.

One of 'the world's leading' academics, Professor Jonathan Zittrain, professor of internet governance at the Oxford Internet Institute, has warned that the internet may come to an end under the weight of... <cue dramatic music>... malicious code.

Unconfirmed reports say that yesterday an acorn fell off a tree, and may have struck the Professor on the head. Whether that inspired his dire warning that the entire cyber world is doomed, is not certain.

But this much we do know. Zittrain has called for the internet to be locked down. Not just by any old software either. No. He has called for a solution that "does not destroy the creativity and openness that made the internet such an enormous success in the first place."

Andrew Clarke, senior VP at Lumension Security was quick to offer advice which we are sure is totally unbiased by any commercial considerations.

"We now operate in a chaotic security environment," he warned. "Only by turning security on its head to enforce a known-good state, can cyber crime be addressed."

Taking the Internet down, until we have a known-good state, with no
known-unknowns, and certainly no unknown-unknowns, may be expensive. But it will be worth it.

"[Everyone] needs to consider deploying technologies that monitor and only allow known good applications or devices to connect to their PC or network," he warned.

OK, he admitted, this 'whitelisting' approach could impact productivity.
But the alternative - a world where no one invests in Lumension Security solutions - could be very frightening indeed.

 

Org. Source : http://www.theinquirer.net, By Nick Booth: Wednesday, 18 June 2008, 9:22 AM

Share/Save/Bookmark


Last Updated on Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:58
  No Comments.
Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)

Waiting for the internet meltdown

E-mail Print PDF

The world is heading for a digital doomsday as the net fast runs out of numerical addresses

The end of the internet is nigh - and in less than three years, according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Can it be true? The problem is that the world is running out of internet addresses. More than 85% of the available addresses have already been allocated and the OECD predicts we will have run out completely by early 2011.

These aren’t the normal web addresses you type into your browser’s window, and which were recently freed up by Icann (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), the body responsible for allocating domain names, to allow thousands of new internet domains ending in, for instance, .london or .xxx.

Beneath these commonsense names lie numerical internet protocol (IP) addresses that denote individual devices connected to the internet. These form the foundation for all online communications, from e-mail and web pages to voice chat and streaming video.

When the current IP address scheme was introduced in 1981 there were fewer than 500 computers connected to the internet. Its founders could be forgiven for thinking that allowing for a potential 4 billion would last for ever. However, less than 30 years later we’re rapidly running out. Every day thousands of new devices ranging from massive web servers down to individual mobile phones go online and gobble up more combinations and permutations.

Just as everyone knows the solution to peak oil (use less of it), the solution to the IP address shortage is equally obvious: upgrade to new addresses that can accommodate our hunger for online connectivity. Such a system, called IPv6 (www.ipv6.org ), was agreed more than a decade ago, providing enough addresses for billions upon billions of devices as well as improving internet phone and video calls, and possibly even helping to end e-mail spam.

Unfortunately - and again like peak oil - just because we know what’s good for us that doesn’t mean we’ll do it. The OECD notes that “immediate costs are associated with deployment of IPv6, whereas many benefits are long-term and depend on a critical mass adopting it”. The problem is that the new system is not really compatible with the internet today. If, for example, Google wants to support IPv6, it will need to build a whole new IPv6 web service, complete with new domain names, servers and bandwidth.

And so the internet lurches on, patched with technology that may help it stagger through a few more years, but doomed to slow down unless big players such as Google, BT and governments start investing now.

Maybe at a philosophical level it’ll be a good thing if the internet packs up. We will all be able to shut down our computers and forget the 24/7 economy. I read recently that Stone Age man, with all his hunting and gathering and other chores, still worked only 22 hours a week.

 

Org. Source:  From July 6, 2008

Share/Save/Bookmark


Last Updated on Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:57
  No Comments.
Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)

The end of the Internet is near

E-mail Print PDF

The end of the Internet is near — and in less than three years, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

The reason? More than 85% of the available addresses have already been allocated and the OECD predicts we will have run out completely by early 2011.

These aren’t the normal web addresses you type into your browser’s window, and which were recently freed up by Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, the body responsible for allocating domain names, to allow thousands of new internet domains ending in, for instance, .newyork, .london or .xxx.

Beneath those names lie numerical Internet protocol addresses that denote individual devices connected to the internet. These form the foundation for all online communications, from e-mail and web pages to voice chat and streaming video.

When the current IP address scheme was introduced in 1981, there were fewer than 500 computers connected to the Internet. Its founders could be forgiven for thinking that allowing for a potential 4 billion would last for ever. However, less than 30 years later, the Internet is rapidly running out. Every day thousands of new devices ranging from massive web servers down to individual mobile phones go online and gobble up more combinations and permutations.

“Shortages are already acute in some regions,” says the OECD. “The situation is critical for the future of the internet economy.”

As addresses run dry we will all feel the pinch: Internet speeds will drop and new connections and services will either be expensive or simply impossible to obtain. The solution to the IP address shortage is an upgrade to new addresses that can accommodate our hunger for online connectivity. Such a system, called IPv6, was agreed more than a decade ago, providing enough addresses for billions upon billions of devices as well as improving Internet phone and video calls, and possibly even helping to end e-mail spam.

Org. Source: www.foxnews.com, July 6th, 2008

Share/Save/Bookmark


Last Updated on Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:58
  No Comments.
Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 2


Login Form


Forum Latest Posts

Words at the End...

Featured:

Visitors at the "end"

Visits [+/-]
Today:
Yesterday:
2 days ago:
86
82
99

-17
This week:
Last week:
2 weeks ago:
571
474
535

-61
This month:
Last month:
2 months ago:
400
2220
2415

-195
This year:
Last year:
2620
26428
-23808

Avg. / day
This week:
Last week:
2 weeks ago:
71.4
67.7
76.4
+3.7
-8.7
This month:
Last month:
2 months ago:
80
74
80.5
+6
-6.5

Newsflash

The Internet Ends Here

You have found it, this is it... the dot at the end of the line, the dot at the end of the last webpage.... final closing </HTML> tag... the last IP address on the internet.... the last domain name, the last website.... THE END ......

 

Or is it not? Will the internet even have an ending? Does it even have a beginning?